Final month South Dakota turned one of many newest states to legalize each medicinal and leisure use of marijuana. Fifty-four p.c of the state’s voters permitted Constitutional Amendment A, the adult-use legalization measure, whereas a medicinal marijuana initiative was permitted by almost 70%. Each measures are scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2021.

Regardless of these vital victories, nevertheless, a faction inside the state authorities is seeking to overturn these outcomes and resurrect hashish prohibition within the Mount Rushmore State.

In late November Kevin Thom, the Sheriff of Pennington County, the second-most populous county in South Dakota, together with state Freeway Patrol Superintendent Rick Miller, filed a lawsuit to throw out Modification A. 

And according to the Rapid City Journal, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem—a vocal opponent of each hashish and hemp legalization in her state—permitted using state funds to assist cowl Miller’s authorized charges.

Making an attempt the Nebraska ploy

At difficulty is a clause inside South Dakota’s state structure, which holds {that a} constitutional modification should contain just one topic. In their lawsuit, Thom and Miller argue that Modification A “proposed a drastic revision to the Structure that would not be proposed…as a result of it addressed a number of topics and purported so as to add a completely new article to the Structure.”

The lawsuit alleges that Modification A was subsequently “void at its inception and will by no means be ratified by South Dakota voters.”

The same “one topic” technique was successfully employed by Nebraska prohibitionists to knock that state’s medical legalization measure off the Nov. 3, 2020, poll. In that case, the Nebraska State Supreme Court docket invalidated the proposed state constitutional modification in early September, almost two months previous to the vote.


Nebraska high court kills 2020 medical marijuana initiative

‘Respect the need of the voters’

Some supporters of Modification A are usually not tolerating this obvious try at political sleight-of-hand. A gaggle of South Dakotans, together with Randy Seiler, chair of the state’s Democratic Occasion, together with a former U.S. Lawyer, a retired Sioux Falls police officer, and several other others filed their very own authorized transient, demanding that Miller and Thom’s lawsuit be dismissed. 

“I believe the need of the voters and the need of the folks needs to be revered,” Seiler told the Rapid City Journal on December 4. “That’s the literal definition of a democracy, the place folks vote and the needs and the choice of the voters is revered.”

Too late to file one of these problem?

Michael Card, an affiliate professor of political science on the College of South Dakota, says these South Dakotans who’re listening to the controversy are largely expressing frustration over the political wrangling. 

Questions are being requested about who’s behind Thom and Miller’s lawsuit, he informed Leafly. “As you may count on,” Card mentioned, “in lots of locations the regulation enforcement group believes that marijuana and different medication are a gateway to worse medication.”

And whereas many South Dakotans won’t have the persistence to unravel a constitutional dispute, “there’s a vocal minority that thinks, for lack of a greater time period, that we’re actually getting screwed as a state as a result of we’re paying on each ends of this lawsuit.”

Card doubts the regulation enforcement lawsuit will succeed. “That is truly an election criticism,” he famous. “The time to file that criticism, as our assistant lawyer normal famous, was earlier than it even obtained on the ballots, earlier than the ballots had been printed.”

Gov. Noem: Some type of legalization will stay

In her annual address on the state budget, delivered on Dec. 8, Gov. Noem made a number of references to South Dakota’s hashish controversy. She identified a finances provision that she mentioned was associated “to the disappointing votes on marijuana on the poll field this yr,” whereas underscoring what she described because the “vital security and regulatory prices” related to each the medical and leisure poll measures.

In states which have legalized adult-use hashish, the tax income generated by marijuana gross sales has far outweighed the comparatively minor prices of regulating the business. In Colorado, greater than $1 billion in state tax income has been realized because the first hashish shops opened in 2014.

Whereas supporting the lawsuit attacking Constitutional Modification A, Noem additionally acknowledged that hashish legalization in some type would happen in her state. She mentioned South Dakota’s authorities would “must current two programs of motion—a path ahead with each leisure and medical, and a second with simply medical.”

Bruce Kennedy's Bio Image

Bruce Kennedy

Bruce Kennedy is an award-winning reporter, editor, and producer based mostly in Colorado. He has lined the authorized hashish business since 2010.

View Bruce Kennedy’s articles